An Oregon rape victim was jailed until she testified against her rapist, lawyer says

An Oregon rape sufferer was jailed till she testified towards her rapist, lawyer says

An Oregon lady whose rapist was convicted final week was jailed till she testified towards him in a uncommon case of prosecutors compelling a sufferer to look in court docket, her lawyer stated Friday.

Her lawyer, Donald Scales, acknowledged there have been “reliable considerations” about whether or not his consumer would present as much as testify.

The 20-year-old lady was held for 9 days starting Sept. 6 with a bail set at $500,000 — an quantity Scales described as “unattainable.” 

A jury convicted the assailant, Christian Sanchez, 30, of a number of crimes on Sept. 16, someday after the lady supplied testimony in a Jackson County court docket, Scales stated.

Sanchez was discovered responsible of rape, sodomy, kidnapping, assault, coercion, illegal use of a weapon and different crimes that occurred over a 7-month interval in 2020, when the lady was 18, the Jackson County District Legal professional’s Workplace stated in a press release.

Sanchez will likely be sentenced Oct. 6. A choose ordered him to stay in jail with out bail till sentencing.

Jackson County Jail in Oregon.
Jackson County Jail in Oregon.Google maps

The sufferer was reportedly held towards her will whereas Sanchez used weapons that included a hammer, a lighter and a screwdriver, the Related Press reported, citing court docket filings.

“It was a horrific scenario,” prosecutor Nick Geil instructed the Medford Mail Tribune.

Scales stated that prosecutors requested a choose that she be jailed as a “materials witness” beneath a state regulation permitting authorities or defendants to compel testimony from people who find themselves unlikely to look in court docket.

Geil and a second prosecutor who dealt with the case, Zori Cook dinner, didn’t reply to requests for remark. In accordance with the Mail Tribune, Cook dinner described the maintain as uncommon however needed.

Scales stated his consumer hadn’t been checking in with sufferer’s companies officers and her relations instructed the court docket they have been involved that she wouldn’t make it.

“They weren’t affirmatively recommending jail,” he stated. “They basically have been saying to the choose that they didn’t have any confidence in her making it to court docket and it will nonetheless be a battle” for them to oversee her.

Scales acknowledged that prosecutors had “reliable considerations” and stated he believed they put important time and thought into how they dealt with the case.

“This was actually a final resort balancing the wants of the sufferer and the wants of the neighborhood to have this case resolved,” he stated.

Scales stated he requested for much less restrictive measures, together with an ankle monitor and a dedication from her mom and older sister that they’d preserve “line of sight” on her, he stated.

“The court docket felt it would not be adequate,” Scales stated, noting that the choose sided with the district lawyer’s workplace.

Scales stated his consumer, in the meantime, noticed jail as “draconian and overly intrusive.”

Scales stated that in his 25 years of practising regulation, he may solely consider a handful of instances through which witnesses have been compelled to testify. And in solely a type of instances was the witness a sufferer, he stated.

“It is a type of robust calls — the rights of the sufferer to be left alone versus the precise of the state to prosecute crimes,” he stated.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *